ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Request to Extend Page Limits From Motion for Summary Judgment 43 . Defendants and Plaintiffs may file briefs (motion and opposition briefs) up to 50 pages, exclusive of a table of contents, a table of cases, and any supporting declarations and exhibits. Any reply brief may be up to 30 pages in length. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/27/2015. (Timken, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 KONG MENG XIONG, and LUH XIONG Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 19 Case No. 1:13-cv-00083-SKO ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS FROM MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 43) 20 CITY OF MERCED, et al., 21 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 22 23 24 On May 26, 2015, Defendants filed a letter brief requesting a page-limit extension on their 25 motion for summary judgment. Defendants explain they wish to file one summary judgment 26 motion addressing the claims of both Plaintiffs. To adequately address all the claims against each 27 of the five Defendants, however, Defendants seek to extend the motion page limit from 30 to 50 28 pages. 1 As there are multiple plaintiffs and defendants, a number of claims at issue, and because 2 Defendants plan to address each Plaintiff's claims together in one motion, both Defendants and 3 Plaintiffs may file briefs (motion and opposition briefs) up to 50 pages, exclusive of a table of 4 contents, a table of cases, and any supporting declarations and exhibits. Any reply brief may be up 5 to 30 pages in length. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.